Tutorial and Activities
Discussion
1 Concept Check & Footprint
⏱ 25 min
Moodle quiz; classify ten digital statements in pairs; challenge two with AI.
Investigation
2 Trends Evidence
⏱ 30 min
Screenshots with query strings, date ranges, geographic filters, and related queries.
Investigation
3 Interpretations + Market Insights
⏱ 30 min
Competing interpretations; market insight data (DataReportal or equivalent); theory into channel decision.
Production
4 Persona + Media Plan
⏱ 25 min
Four-sentence persona; start five-day media plan; peer check.
Assessment
5 Peer Audit & Upload
⏱ 10 min
Peer evidence checklist; author responds; submit PDF to Moodle.
| Time | Activity | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 0:00 to 0:05 | Opening concept check (Moodle quiz) and topic confirmation | Concept gap noted; campaign topic confirmed |
| 0:05 to 0:25 | Activity 1: Footprint or Signal? (pairs) | Classification table with AI challenge note |
| 0:25 to 0:55 | Activity 2, Part 1: Google Trends evidence capture | 2 to 3 documented screenshots in evidence worksheet |
| 0:55 to 1:05 | Activity 3: Competing interpretations | One-paragraph reasoning note |
| 1:05 to 1:25 | Activity 2, Part 2 + Activity 4: Market insight capture and theory into decision (combined) | Market insight screenshots; decision-change table |
If you are running behind on evidence capture, keep going and complete the earlier step in your self-directed hours. Artefact quality matters more than breadth at this stage.
| Time | Activity | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1:25 to 1:40 | Activity 5, Part A: Draft persona (15 min) | Four-sentence persona with trace citations |
| 1:40 to 1:45 | Peer check: persona (5 min) | One revision made before moving on |
| 1:45 to 1:50 | Activity 5, Part B: Start media plan (5 min in session) | First two rows of plan started |
| 1:50 to 2:00 | Activity 6: Peer evidence audit and upload | Checklist returned; PDF uploaded to Moodle |
The persona and media plan continue in your six self-directed hours. The draft you upload today is a starting point, not a finished submission.
The brief is on Moodle. Key points:
If you are unsure whether your topic works: enter it into Google Trends right now. If there is a clear interest line over the last 12 months, you have enough to start. If the line is flat at zero, choose a related but broader topic.
Work in pairs. Classify each statement using one label: footprint, evidence, inference, assumption, or recommendation. Record a one-sentence reason. Then challenge two of your classifications with AI and note the final decision.
| # | Statement |
|---|---|
| 1 | Searches for “digital marketing course Maldives” increased by 42 per cent over twelve months to December 2025 (Google Trends). |
| 2 | A TripAdvisor review: “The villa was beautiful but there was no information about reaching it from the ferry terminal.” |
| 3 | Google Trends related queries for “small business marketing” in Maldives show “Facebook page setup” and “Instagram tips for business” as top rising queries. |
| 4 | Market Finder reports that 68 per cent of internet users in the Maldives access the internet primarily via mobile devices. |
| 5 | A Reddit thread in r/maldivesnomads has 47 upvotes on “Best atolls for remote workers” with 23 comments about coworking and connectivity. |
| 6 | A YouTube video titled “How to run Facebook Ads for your guesthouse” has 8,200 views and 143 comments. |
| 7 | A guesthouse owner in a Facebook group: “We get most of our bookings through Instagram direct messages, not our website.” |
| 8 | World Bank Open Data: mobile cellular subscriptions in Maldives at 209 per 100 people in 2023. |
| 9 | Avas.mv headline: “Young Maldivians prefer digital payments over cash, new survey finds.” |
| 10 | A Facebook post in a Maldives tourism group: shared 312 times, 87 comments asking for booking information. |
Open: trends.google.com
Target: 2 to 3 screenshots with full documentation before moving to Activity 3.
Enter your primary search term. Use the exact phrase your audience would type, not a marketing description. (Example: “local island Maldives”, not “authentic Maldives experience”.)
Set the location. Start with Worldwide. Then re-run with your target market region (e.g., United Kingdom, Europe, or a specific country). Screenshot both.
Set the date range. Use “Past 12 months” for your primary screenshot. Then check “Past 5 years” to see whether interest is growing, declining, or stable.
Record what you see before you interpret it. Write down: the term, the location, the date range, today’s date, and a description of the trend line. Do this before noting what it might mean.
Screenshot requirement: title the image file with the format:
trends-[term]-[region]-[YYYY-MM-DD].png. This becomes your source reference.
Scroll down to Related Queries. Check both “Top” and “Rising.” Screenshot the top 5 entries from each. These reveal the words your audience is actually using: record them verbatim.
Compare a second search term. Click “Add comparison” and enter a related term. This shows which variant has higher search interest and helps you choose the vocabulary for your persona.
Check Interest by Region. Scroll to the regional map. Screenshot the top 5 regions. Note whether the pattern matches your intended target market or reveals an unexpected geographic concentration.
Before moving on, confirm you have:
| Item | Collected? |
|---|---|
| Primary term trend screenshot (12 months) | Yes / No |
| Primary term trend screenshot (5 years) | Yes / No |
| Related queries screenshot (top and rising) | Yes / No |
| Comparison term screenshot | Yes / No |
| Interest by region screenshot | Yes / No |
For each screenshot, complete one row of your evidence worksheet:
| Field | What to record | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Tool | Google Trends | Google Trends |
| Search term | Exact term entered | “local island Maldives” |
| Location | Region selected | Worldwide |
| Date range | Period shown on chart | 1 Jan 2025 to 1 Jan 2026 |
| Collection date | Today’s date | 2026-05-18 |
| Footprint (what I see) | Describe the trend line objectively | Interest rose sharply from April to August; stable plateau after September |
| Signal (what it may indicate) | Careful interpretation | Seasonal interest may peak in summer months; campaigns may need to anticipate this window |
| Caution | What this does not prove | Does not confirm purchase intent; seasonal news events may have influenced the peak |
Fill in all eight fields. A screenshot with no documentation is unverifiable evidence.
Choose one market insight source. Open it now and take 1 to 2 documented screenshots, then complete the decision-change table (Activity 4) before moving to the persona.
| Tool | Best for | Requirement | URL |
|---|---|---|---|
| DataReportal | Country-level digital statistics: internet users, social penetration, platform use | None: fully free, no account | datareportal.com/reports |
| Google Market Finder | Priority export markets and digital consumer index by country | A published website URL for your campaign topic | marketfinder.thinkwithgoogle.com |
| Think with Google | Consumer insight articles and trend data by category | None | thinkwithgoogle.com/consumer-insights |
| World Bank Open Data | Internet access rates, mobile subscriptions, population data | None | data.worldbank.org |
Steps (all tools):
For each market insight screenshot, complete one row of your evidence worksheet:
| Field | What to record | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Tool | Name of the source used | DataReportal |
| Source detail | Report title, URL, or statistic name | “Digital 2026: Maldives” at datareportal.com/reports |
| Region / Category | Country or category searched | Maldives |
| Collection date | Today’s date | 2026-06-27 |
| Footprint (what I see) | Statistics or indicators shown | 84% of the Maldives population uses social media; Facebook and Instagram are the top platforms |
| Signal (what it may indicate) | Careful interpretation | High social penetration may indicate that social channels are viable for awareness campaigns targeting a broad adult audience |
| Caution | What this does not prove | Penetration figures show access and usage; they do not confirm that this audience actively seeks campaign-related content on these platforms |
Label the output as an inference, not a conclusion. Population-level statistics describe the environment, not the specific target audience.
Beyond Trends and Market Finder, you need at least one more public trace. Options:
| Source type | Where to find it | What to record |
|---|---|---|
| OTA reviews | TripAdvisor, Booking.com, Airbnb (for tourism topics) | Platform, number of reviews checked, date range, recurring phrases or themes |
| Forum questions | Reddit, Quora, community Facebook groups | Platform, number of threads, date range, exact questions quoted |
| Competitor social content | Public Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn pages | Platform, post type, engagement indicators (likes, comments, shares), content themes |
| Credible report or dataset | Ministry of Tourism, GSMA, Statista (free tier), academic source | Author/organisation, year, page reference, key statistic quoted |
| YouTube search suggestions | Type your topic into YouTube search bar | Exact search term used, date, auto-complete suggestions shown (screenshot) |
At least one of your three evidence sources must be a public review, question, or credible report, in addition to Trends and your market insight source.
Individual. Read the trace below. Complete three steps before looking at the AI’s answer.
Trace: Google Trends (Maldives) shows searches for “online course” rose 68 per cent year on year in the twelve months to January 2025. Top related queries: “online certificate programmes”, “diploma in business management online”, “evening classes Male”. Interest concentrated in Male atoll. Collected: 15 January 2025.
Step 1. Write three possible interpretations using hedged language: “this may suggest…”, “one possibility is…”, “this could indicate…”.
Step 2. Ask AI for three possible interpretations of the same trace. Record the exact prompt.
Step 3. Select the most defensible interpretation across both sets. In two sentences: (a) why it is stronger than the alternatives, (b) what evidence would confirm it.
Tip
The strongest interpretation is the one closest to what the trace shows with the fewest added assumptions. If an interpretation adds audience motivation, emotion, or purchase intent that is not in the data, it is an assumption.
Individual. Apply uses and gratifications theory or social contagion theory to revise one decision in your emerging plan.
| Element | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Campaign topic | |
| Original channel or message decision | |
| Theory applied | Uses and Gratifications or Social Contagion |
| Specific principle from the theory | |
| Revised decision | |
| Evidence item from your worksheet that supports the revision |
Worked example:
| Element | Example |
|---|---|
| Topic | Weekend digital skills workshop for guesthouse owners |
| Original decision | General Facebook feed advertisement |
| Theory | Uses and gratifications |
| Principle | Audience uses Facebook to solve business problems (information-seeking), not for entertainment |
| Revised decision | Targeted posts in Facebook business groups framed as “how to” answers |
| Evidence | Google Trends related query: “how to market guesthouse online” (Trace 3) |
You now have at least three documented evidence items. Write one paragraph of three to four sentences using the template on the next slide.
Write first. Peer-check after.
Fill in each bracket, cite a Trace number for each claim, or label it [ASSUMPTION]. Then remove the brackets and read it aloud.
Sentence 1: [Audience segment: who they are and their role or situation] who [situation or problem they face right now].
Sentence 2: They are motivated by [what they are trying to accomplish], but their main barrier is [the specific obstacle the campaign must address].
Sentence 3: They tend to [media habits: where and how they seek information or make decisions].
Sentence 4: This persona is grounded in [evidence summary: name which traces support it]; the assumption that [key assumption] would require further primary research to confirm.
Seven elements to verify (all must be present):
| Element | Check |
|---|---|
| Segment | Grounded in a public trace, not assumed |
| Situation or problem | Which trace reveals this need? |
| Motivation | Does a U&G or contagion signal support this? |
| Barrier | Specific enough to change a campaign decision? |
| Media habits | Which trace shows where they seek information? |
| Evidence summary | All named traces documented in the worksheet? |
| Key assumption | The one claim most in need of primary research? |
Swap with your partner. Complete the checklist. Return with one improvement suggestion.
| Check | Pass or Needs Work |
|---|---|
| Is it a single paragraph of three to four sentences? | |
| Does every claim cite a Trace number or carry [ASSUMPTION]? | |
| Does it describe a real situation and a specific barrier? | |
| Is the barrier specific enough to change a campaign decision? | |
| Does it avoid undefendable adjectives (e.g., “tech-savvy”, “passionate”)? | |
| Is the key assumption clearly named in sentence 4? |
Write one sentence of specific feedback: which claim needs a stronger evidence link or a sharper statement?
Author: read the comment, revise one sentence, then move to the media plan.
The media plan is a five-day argument that builds from attention to action.
Start one or two rows in session. Complete all five rows during your self-directed study hours.
Every row must have: Day / Goal / Channel / Message / Format / Budget tier / Metric.
Complete one row per day. Every decision should connect to a trace from your evidence worksheet or a principle from the persona.
| Day | Goal | Channel | Message (one sentence) | Format | Budget tier | Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monday | ||||||
| Tuesday | ||||||
| Wednesday | ||||||
| Thursday | ||||||
| Friday |
Goal options: Awareness / Question-answering / Enquiry generation / Sharing / Decision support
Budget tiers: Owned (no paid spend) / Low paid boost (under MVR 500 / USD 30) / Organic only / Retargeting only
The progression should move from Attention (Mon) through Relevance, Resource, Proof, to Action (Fri). A plan with five identical “awareness” rows needs revision: each day should reflect a different stage in the audience’s journey.
Before submitting, confirm each row passes these checks:
| Check | Row passes if… |
|---|---|
| Does the goal match what the audience needs at this stage? | The goal reflects where the audience is in their decision journey |
| Does the channel have strong fit for this goal and this audience? | The audience already uses this channel for this kind of task |
| Does the message address the specific barrier in the persona? | The message speaks to the identified obstacle, not a generic benefit |
| Does the metric measure the behaviour the goal requires? | An awareness goal has a reach or completion metric; an action goal has a conversion metric |
| Is the budget tier realistic for the channel? | Paid channels have a budget entry; owned channels say “no paid spend” |
Apply the social contagion diagnostic: does each message give the audience a reason to share, discuss, or return? A message with a weak sharing reason should be revised before the channel is changed.
Your prompt log must show how AI augmented your evidence work rather than substituting for it.
Minimum three entries. Each entry links to a specific evidence item or a decision in the persona or plan.
Complete at least three rows of this table:
| Entry | Purpose | Exact prompt used | AI output (paste or summarise) | Evidence link | Your decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Search route generation | Paste your exact prompt here | Paste or summarise what AI returned | Link to which screenshot this informed | Why you accepted, revised, or rejected the output |
| 2 | Trace interpretation | Paste your exact prompt here | Paste or summarise what AI returned | Link to which evidence item this informed | Why you accepted, revised, or rejected the output |
| 3 | Persona or plan review | Paste your exact prompt here | Paste or summarise what AI returned | N/A | Why you accepted, revised, or rejected the output |
If you completed the session without AI assistance: write three example prompts you would use and describe what you would do with the output. A log entry explaining your approach is required in place of a blank log.
A completed prompt log is required for all submissions, regardless of content quality.
The reflection is a critical evaluation of your evidence choices: three paragraphs, one claim each.
| Paragraph | Write about… | How to start |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Evidence | What specific claim does your evidence support? Name the evidence item and the inference. | “The evidence supports the inference that…” |
| 2. Uncertainty | What assumption did you make that still needs testing? Name it and the method you would use to confirm it. | “The key assumption in this persona is… A short survey of… would be needed to confirm it.” |
| 3. Ethical risk | What is one limit of using public traces in this campaign? What would you do differently with a larger research budget? | “A public-trace approach can show… but cannot confirm… With a larger budget, I would…” |
Each paragraph: 80 to 100 words. Target total: 300 words.
Start paragraph 1 with the claim itself: “The evidence supports the inference that…”
Exchange your evidence worksheet with your partner.
Reviewer: complete the checklist on the next slide for each evidence item.
Author: respond to at least one comment, then upload your PDF to Moodle before leaving.
Mark each item honestly before you upload.
| Item | Status |
|---|---|
| Campaign topic: one sentence | Done / In progress |
| Google Trends evidence: at least 2 screenshots, all worksheet fields completed | Done / In progress |
| Market insight source evidence: at least 1 screenshot (DataReportal, Market Finder, or equivalent), all worksheet fields completed | Done / In progress |
| Third public trace: review, question, or credible report | Done / In progress |
| Evidence worksheet: 4 rows, all fields completed | Done / In progress |
| AI prompt log: minimum 3 entries, all fields completed | Done / In progress |
| One-paragraph persona: four sentences, every claim cites a trace or [ASSUMPTION] | Done / In progress |
| Five-day media plan: goal, channel, message, format, resource, and metric for all five rows | Done / In progress |
| 300-word reflection: three paragraphs on evidence, uncertainty, and ethical risk | Done / In progress |
| One primary research method named (the assumption stated in persona sentence 4) | Done / In progress |
| Reference list in APA format, including Google Trends and your market insight source | Done / In progress |
Deadline and upload instructions are on Moodle. A submission missing any item may be returned for resubmission.
Before you close your laptop, write these three sentences:
“The evidence I collected supports the claim that…” (complete the sentence with a specific, labelled inference from your evidence worksheet)
“The assumption in my persona that would need further testing is…” (name it precisely)
“One ethical limit of using public traces in this campaign is…” (name a specific limit, not a general statement about privacy)
These three sentences are the skeleton of your 300-word reflection. Write them now while the evidence is fresh. Return to them in your self-directed study hours to expand each into a full paragraph.
What you have built today:
Self-directed hours this week (6 hours):
| Task | Suggested time |
|---|---|
| Refine persona and check every sentence against evidence | 1.5 hours |
| Complete and expand 300-word reflection | 1.5 hours |
| Format evidence worksheet, reference list, and prompt log for submission | 1 hour |
| Read Week 1 chapter sections on any learning objective you marked as weak | 2 hours |
Week 2 preview: Campaign Planning Canvas. Your Week 1 persona is the audience input. Bring it to the next session.
The Evidence-Based Digital Marketer · Week 1 · Tutorial